hypertoxic: (Default)
Vʀɪsᴋᴀ Sᴇʀᴋᴇᴛ ♏ ᴀʀᴀᴄʜɴɪᴅsGʀɪᴘ ([personal profile] hypertoxic) wrote in [community profile] asgarddawning 2012-03-27 05:24 am (UTC)

IN DEFENSE OF BI-MONTHLY APP CYCLES

not that i necessarily think that's what we should do but just sayin' for the people bringing these points up

1) apps will initially double and then settle down, they will definitely not stay at a raised rate, believe me

2) it seems like it would deter people from apping but generally most people don't seem to notice. if they really want in they'll app anyway. if they didn't, they might have just flaked right back out anyway.

are there other points of contention??? idk just saying mostly. my primary position is still just an app cap, or capping one-character-per-mun. (not both, mind you.)

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting